Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Carolea Hassard's avatar

The only way I know to explain DEI is to point out that people tend to stick with people who look like themselves. So it's not necessarily nefarious that white men hire only white men, it's more to do with staying in the tribe. And so many businesses and governments are run by white men that DEI helps ensure that white men actually look at women and people of color as candidates for hire.

DEI is absolutely necessary. The hard part is when you're dealing with racists and misogynists. Regulation is all we've got because you're not likely to succeed with these people by trying to teach them sensitivity.

This is simplistic, but it's like using traffic signals to let other people through the intersection. Some folks have to be forced to do it and be fined when they don't.

Any teaching probably needs to focus on showing people that exercising superiority over others is bad for society. All folks are created equal. In a true democracy, that is.

Expand full comment
Susan Watchman's avatar

It's the "industry of DEI" that I find the objectionable pieceof all this- as with prior iterations going back to "sensitivity training" 50 yrs ago. Once those workplace seminars or protocols with boxes to check become requirements, people tune out.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts